19.08.2019
 Workplace Conversation Essay

Int J Qualitative Stud Health Health and wellness

EMPIRICAL RESEARCH

Well-being in the workplace through connection between person characteristics and organizational context

GIANLUCA BIGGIO, Professor1 & CLAUDIO G. CORTESE, PhD Professor2 one particular

Department of Communication Savoir, University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy and 2Department of Psychology, University or college of Turin, Turin, Italia

Abstract

Health and wellness in the workplace is regarded as by many authors to be the result of the connection between person characteristics and people of the functioning and company environment. This study should understand the value attributed to the concept of well-being at work by personnel, its affecting factors, and, among all those, the function of specific psychological attributes. The research was conducted on a sample of 72 employees using a qualitative approach based upon focus organizations and individual interviews. Data analysis was performed by a paper and pencil approach. The focus teams and selection interviews collected 628 statements, which were divided into 3 main areas: meaning of well-being in the workplace (248), any sort factors that affect health in the workplace (158), and individual characteristics that affect wellbeing in the workplace (222). The individual characteristics identified by the participants because capable of influencing well-being in the workplace contain being positive, communication, administration of issues and conflicts, socio-emotional skills, and beliefs. The research was limited by the participants included and by the only use of the paper and pencil technique of data examination. Results emphasize that health in the workplace does not depend specifically on exterior conditions regarding the working and organizational environment within which the individual functions: so , it might be promoted not merely from above, through actions by management, nevertheless also coming from below, influencing individual attributes and behaviors. Results would be useful for developing training, work environment counselling, and organizational development activities was executed to support small groups, frontrunners, and other ideal players inside the construction of the subsystems of wellbeing in the workplace.

Key words: Interaction, emotion in organizations, worker attitudes, company behaviour, company psychology, organizational well-being, character, work environment (Accepted: 22 December 2012; Released: 18 March 2013)

The theme of health and wellness in the office

can be observed from a specific point of view,

stemming from which well-being itself is definitely recognizable as the result of discussion between the characteristics of the individual and those of the functioning context. Basically, contrary to the supposition

according where well-being at work

depends specifically on exterior conditions when it comes to

of the working and organizational environment

within which the person operates (Burke, 1993;

Guest, 2002; Lawson, Noblet, & Rodwell, 2009),

the point of view labeled suggests that individual

characteristics may play a working part inside the development of wellbeing. Exploring the views of the creators who have treated

with well-being as a result of the interaction between

subjective elements and attributes of the place of work, it is possible to acknowledge a common underlying in interactional theories, which will considers a personГЃ

business fit as being crucial in generating wellbeing (Alvesson & Willmott, 2002; Cable & Judge, mil novecentos e noventa e seis; Mininni, Manuti, Scardigno, & Rubino,

2010), and 3 main aspects of study by which

this basic approach offers declined: study regarding

job satisfaction, positive thoughts, and relational

interaction.

Task satisfaction

A basic approach, which includes permitted the analysis

of the relationship among well-being inside the

workplace and subjectivity, was the study of job

Messages: Claudio G. Cortese, Dipartimento di Idiosincrasia, Universita degli Studi...

References: Allcorn, S i9000. (1995). Understanding organizational lifestyle as the

quality of workplace subjectivity

Bandura, A. (1986). Interpersonal foundation of believed and actions: A social

cognitive theory

Borman, T. C., & Penner, T. A. (2001). Citizenship performance:

Its mother nature, antecedents, and motives

Brunstein, J. C., Schultheiss, Um. C., & Grassmann, Ur. (1998).

Burkie, R. (1993). Organizational-level affluence to reduce

occupational stressors

Cable connection, D. Meters., & Assess, T. A. (1996). Person-organization п¬Ѓt, work

choice decisions, and company entry

Cooper, C. T. (2010). The happiness agenda. Stress and Health,

26(5), 349

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of

Вґ

Custers, Ur., & Aarts, H. (2005). Positive influence as acted

motivator: For the non-conscious procedure of behavioral

D'Amato, A., & Zijlstra, R. H. (2008). Internal climate and

individual elements as antecedents of work results

Di Nuovo, S., & Zanchi, T. (2008). Operate well-being: Research

on satisfaction and positive emotions in job

Diskiene, D., & Gostautas, V. (2010). Romance between

Л‡

Ferguson, M. (2009). Resilience: What you need to know regarding

personal well-being

(2000). Politics skill at the office. Organizational Characteristics,

28(4), 25ГЃ37

Fineman, H. (2006). Upon being positive: Concerns and counterpoints. The Academy of Management Assessment, 31(2), 270ГЃ291.

French, T. R. P., Caplan, 3rd there’s r. D., & Van Harrison, R. (1982). The

system of task stress and strain

Gabriel, Y. (2000). Storytelling in organizations: Information, п¬Ѓctions, and

fantasies

George, J. M., & Roberts, G. Ur. (1997). Organizational spontaneity

in context